lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC net-next Patch v2 4/4] net: bridge: mrp: switchdev: Add HW offload
The 01/14/2020 00:30, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> Hi Horatiu
>
> It has been said a few times what the basic state machine should be in
> user space. A pure software solution can use raw sockets to send and
> receive MRP_Test test frames. When considering hardware acceleration,
> the switchdev API you have proposed here seems quite simple. It should
> not be too hard to map it to a set of netlink messages from userspace.

Yes and we will try to go with this approach, to have a user space
application that contains the state machines and then in the kernel to
extend the netlink messages to map to the switchdev API.
So we will create a new RFC once we will have the user space and the
definition of the netlink messages.

>
> Yet your argument for kernel, not user space, is you are worried about
> the parameters which need to be passed to the hardware offload engine.
> In order to win the argument for a kernel solution, we are going to
> need a better idea what you think this problem is. The MRP_Test is TLV
> based. Are there other things which could be in this message? Is that
> what you are worried about?

>
> Thanks
> Andrew

--
/Horatiu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-14 09:09    [W:0.045 / U:2.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site