lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the random tree
From
Date


> On Jan 14, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:22:21AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I didn't realize I was the author. Sorry!
>>
>> Sure, confirmed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
>>
>
> Hmm... the e-mail in question[1] was sent by Qian Cai, but there was a
>
> From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
>
> in the first line of the body which attributed the patch to you. But
> then e-mail continues:
>
> Sergey didn't like the locking order .... but those code is so old,
> and I have no clue how to de-couple it after checking other locks in
> the splat. There is an onging effort to make all printk() as deferred,
> so until that happens, workaround it for now as a short-term fix.
>
> So did Qian Cai author the patch, and this should have been
> "Reported-by Sergey Senozhatsky"? In which case I need a
> Signed-off-by from Qian Cai.
>
> This is a pretty trivial patch, but it would be good to get the
> attributions and credit correct!
>
> - Ted
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1573679785-21068-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw/

It is actually Sergey proposed an informal patch here [1]. I just sent on
his behave and adding a commit log.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190911011008.GA4420@jagdpanzerIV/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-14 18:31    [W:0.046 / U:20.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site