lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/nohz: Optimize get_nohz_timer_target()
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 22:12, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Wanpeng,
>
> Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> > On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 16:29, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> > I didn't see your refactor to get_nohz_timer_target() which you
> >> > mentioned in IRC after four months, I can observe cyclictest drop from
> >> > 4~5us to 8us in kvm guest(we offload the lapic timer emulation to
> >> > housekeeping cpu to avoid timer fire external interrupt on the pCPU
> >> > which vCPU resident incur a vCPU vmexit) w/o this patch in the case of
> >> > there is no busy housekeeping cpu. The score can be recovered after I
> >> > give stress to create a busy housekeeping cpu.
> >> >
> >> > Could you consider applying this patch for temporary since I'm not
> >> > sure when the refactor can be ready.
> >>
> >> Yeah. It's delayed (again).... Will pick that up.
> >
> > I didn't find WIP tag for this work after ~half year since v4 was
> > posted https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/28/231 Could you apply this patch
> > for temporary because the completion time of refactor is not
> > deterministic.
>
> Could you please repost it?

Just repost, thanks Thomas.

Wanpeng

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-13 02:33    [W:0.056 / U:56.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site