Messages in this thread | | | From | Jianyong Wu <> | Subject | RE: [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 | Date | Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:15:58 +0000 |
| |
Hi Marc,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 5:46 PM > To: Jianyong Wu <Jianyong.Wu@arm.com> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; yangbo.lu@nxp.com; john.stultz@linaro.org; > tglx@linutronix.de; pbonzini@redhat.com; sean.j.christopherson@intel.com; > richardcochran@gmail.com; Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>; > will@kernel.org; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>; Steven Price > <Steven.Price@arm.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; > kvm@vger.kernel.org; Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>; Kaly Xin > <Kaly.Xin@arm.com>; Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; > kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 > > On 2020-01-09 09:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2020-01-09 05:59, Jianyong Wu wrote: > > [...] > > >> So we focus it on arm64. Also I have never tested it on arm32 machine > >> ( we lack of arm32 machine) > > > > I'm sure your employer can provide you with such a box. I can probably > > even tell you which cupboard they are stored in... ;-) > > > >> Do you think it's necessary to enable ptp_kvm on arm32? If so, I can > >> do that. > > > > I can't see why we wouldn't, given that it should be a zero effort > > task (none of the code here is arch specific). > > To be clear, what I'm after is support for 32bit *guests*. I don't expect any > issue with a 32bit host (it's all common code), but you should be able to test > 32bit guests pretty easily (most ARMv8.0 CPUs support 32bit EL1). > Get it
Thanks Jianyong
> M. > -- > Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
| |