[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 5.3-rc7
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:17 PM Linus Torvalds
<> wrote:
> I'm really not clear on why it's a good idea to clear the LDR bits on
> shutdown, and commit 558682b52919 ("x86/apic: Include the LDR when
> clearing out APIC registers") just looks pointless. And now it has
> proven to break some machines.
> So why wouldn't we just revert it?

Side note: looking around for the discussion about this patch, at
least one version of the patch from Bandan had

+ if (!x2apic_enabled) {

rather than

+ if (!x2apic_enabled()) {

which meant that whatever Bandan tested at that point was actually a
complete no-op, since "!x2apic_enabled" is never true (it tests a
function pointer against NULL, which it won't be).

Then that was fixed by the time it hit -tip (and eventually my tree),
but it kind of shows how the patch history of this is all
questionable. Further strengthened by a quote from that discussion:

"this is really a KVM bug but it doesn't hurt to clear out the LDR in
the guest and then, it wouldn't need a hypervisor fix"

and clearly it *does* hurt to clear the LDR in the guest, making the
whole thinking behind the patch wrong and broken. The kernel clearly
_does_ depend on LDR having the right contents.

Now, I still suspect the boot problem then comes from our
cpu0_logical_apicid use mentioned in that previous email, but at this
point I think the proper fix is "revert for now, and we can look at
this as a cleanup with the cpu0_logical_apicid thing for 5.4 instead".



 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-07 21:28    [W:0.045 / U:5.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site