Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:03:26 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Enhance the hv_vmbus driver to support hibernation |
| |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:01:14PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: >This patchset (consisting of 9 patches) was part of the v4 patchset (consisting >of 12 patches): > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/2/894 > >The other 3 patches in v4 are posted in another patchset, which will go >through the tip.git tree. > >All the 9 patches here are now rebased to the hyperv tree's hyperv-next branch: >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hyperv/linux.git/log/?h=hyperv-next >, and all the 9 patches have Michael Kelley's Signed-off-by's. > >Please review.
Given that these two series depend on each other, I'd much prefer for them to go through one tree.
But, I may be wrong, and I'm going to see if a scenario such as this make sense. I've queued this one to the hyperv-next, but I'll wait for the x86 folks to send their pull request to Linus first before I do it for these patches.
Usually cases such as these are the exception, but for Hyper-V it seems to be the norm, so I'm curious to see how this will unfold.
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |