lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: move common keyring handler functions to new file
Date
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> (Cc'ing Josh Boyer, David Howells)
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 21:55 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>> > The handlers to add the keys to the .platform keyring and blacklisted
>> > hashes to the .blacklist keyring is common for both the uefi and powerpc
>> > mechanisms of loading the keys/hashes from the firmware.
>> >
>> > This patch moves the common code from load_uefi.c to keyring_handler.c
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>
>> > ---
>> > security/integrity/Makefile | 3 +-
>> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.h | 32 ++++++++
>> > security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c | 67 +---------------
>> > 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
>> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.h
>>
>> This has no acks from security folks, though I'm not really clear on who
>> maintains those files.
>
> I upstreamed David's, Josh's, and Nayna's patches, so that's probably
> me.
>
>> Do I take it because it's mostly just code movement people are OK with
>> it going in via the powerpc tree?
>
> Yes, the only reason for splitting load_uefi.c is for powerpc.  These
> patches should be upstreamed together.  

Thanks.

cheers

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-05 06:00    [W:0.086 / U:1.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site