lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] nfp: Drop unnecessary continue in nfp_net_pf_alloc_vnics
On 2019/9/17 10:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:46:23 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> Continue is not needed at the bottom of a loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
>> index 986464d..68db47d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
>> @@ -205,10 +205,8 @@ static void nfp_net_pf_free_vnics(struct nfp_pf *pf)
>> ctrl_bar += NFP_PF_CSR_SLICE_SIZE;
>>
>> /* Kill the vNIC if app init marked it as invalid */
>> - if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID) {
>> + if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID)
>> nfp_net_pf_free_vnic(pf, nn);
>> - continue;
>> - }
> Ugh, I already nack at least one patch like this, this continue makes
> the _intent_ of the code more clear, the compiler will ignore it anyway.
Thanks, I miss that information you object to above modification.

Sincerely,
zhong jiang
> I guess there's no use in fighting the bots..
>
>> }
>>
>> if (list_empty(&pf->vnics))
>
> .
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-17 05:08    [W:0.039 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site