lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] quota: fix wrong condition in is_quota_modification()
From
Date
On 2019/9/12 18:06, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 11-09-19 17:36:50, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Quoted from
>> commit 3da40c7b0898 ("ext4: only call ext4_truncate when size <= isize")
>>
>> " At LSF we decided that if we truncate up from isize we shouldn't trim
>> fallocated blocks that were fallocated with KEEP_SIZE and are past the
>> new i_size. This patch fixes ext4 to do this. "
>>
>> And generic/092 of fstest have covered this case for long time, however
>> is_quota_modification() didn't adjust based on that rule, so that in
>> below condition, we will lose to quota block change:
>> - fallocate blocks beyond EOF
>> - remount
>> - truncate(file_path, file_size)
>>
>> Fix it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/quotaops.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/quotaops.h b/include/linux/quotaops.h
>> index dc905a4ff8d7..bd30acad3a7f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/quotaops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/quotaops.h
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static inline struct quota_info *sb_dqopt(struct super_block *sb)
>> /* i_mutex must being held */
>> static inline bool is_quota_modification(struct inode *inode, struct iattr *ia)
>> {
>> - return (ia->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE && ia->ia_size != inode->i_size) ||
>> + return (ia->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE && ia->ia_size <= inode->i_size) ||
>> (ia->ia_valid & ATTR_UID && !uid_eq(ia->ia_uid, inode->i_uid)) ||
>> (ia->ia_valid & ATTR_GID && !gid_eq(ia->ia_gid, inode->i_gid));
>> }
>
> OK, but your change makes i_size extension not to be quota modification

I just try to adapt below rules covered with generic/092, which restrict to not
trim preallocate blocks beyond i_size, in that case, filesystem won't change
i_blocks.

1) truncate(i_size) will trim all blocks past i_size.
2) truncate(x) where x > i_size will not trim all blocks past i_size.

However, I'm okay with your change, because there could be filesystems won't
follow above rule.

Thanks,

> which is IMO wrong. So I think the condition should just be:
>
> return (ia->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) || ...
>
> I'll fix the patch up and pull it into my tree.
>
> Honza
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-09-16 04:54    [W:0.058 / U:5.968 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site