lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] bpf: validate bpf_func when BPF_JIT is enabled
    From
    Date

    On 2019-09-11 09:42, Yonghong Song wrote:
    > I am not an expert in XDP testing. Toke, Björn, could you give some
    > suggestions what to test for XDP performance here?

    I ran the "xdp_rxq_info" sample with and without Sami's patch:

    $ sudo ./xdp_rxq_info --dev enp134s0f0 --action XDP_DROP

    Before:

    Running XDP on dev:enp134s0f0 (ifindex:6) action:XDP_DROP options:no_touch
    XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
    XDP-RX CPU 20 23923874 0
    XDP-RX CPU total 23923874

    RXQ stats RXQ:CPU pps issue-pps
    rx_queue_index 20:20 23923878 0
    rx_queue_index 20:sum 23923878

    After Sami's patch:

    Running XDP on dev:enp134s0f0 (ifindex:6) action:XDP_DROP options:no_touch
    XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
    XDP-RX CPU 20 22998700 0
    XDP-RX CPU total 22998700

    RXQ stats RXQ:CPU pps issue-pps
    rx_queue_index 20:20 22998705 0
    rx_queue_index 20:sum 22998705


    So, roughly ~4% for this somewhat naive scenario.


    As for XDP performance tests; I guess some of the XDP selftests could be
    used as well!


    Björn

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-09-11 12:39    [W:2.323 / U:0.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site