lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v21 16/28] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave Driver
Date
ECPM permissions are mentioned in SDM EADD instruction operation. PTE I 
don't know.

--
Jethro Beekman | Fortanix

On 2019-08-07 08:17, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 06:15:34PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:17:57AM +0000, Ayoun, Serge wrote:
>>>> + /* TCS pages need to be RW in the PTEs, but can be 0 in the EPCM. */
>>>> + if ((secinfo.flags & SGX_SECINFO_PAGE_TYPE_MASK) ==
>>>> SGX_SECINFO_TCS)
>>>> + prot |= PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
>>>
>>> For TCS pages you add both RD and WR maximum protection bits.
>>> For the enclave to be able to run, user mode will have to change the
>>> "vma->vm_flags" from PROT_NONE to PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE (otherwise
>>> eenter fails). This is exactly what your selftest does.
>>
>> Recap where the TCS requirements came from? Why does it need
>> RW in PTEs and can be 0 in the EPCM? The comment should explain
>> it rather leave it as a claim IMHO.
>
> I mean after ~3 weeks of not looking into SGX (because being
> on vacation etc.) I cannot remember details of this.
>
> /Jarkko
>

[unhandled content-type:application/pkcs7-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-07 18:46    [W:0.117 / U:21.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site