lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/6] tty: serial: Add linflexuart driver for S32V234
Date
On 8/6/2019 9:40 PM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:11:17PM +0000, Stefan-gabriel Mirea wrote:
>> On 8/5/2019 6:31 PM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:47:23PM +0000, Stefan-gabriel Mirea wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +/* Freescale Linflex UART */
>>>> +#define PORT_LINFLEXUART 121
>>>
>>> Do you really need this modified?
>>
>> Hello Greg,
>>
>> This macro is meant to be assigned to port->type in the config_port
>> method from uart_ops, in order for verify_port to know if the received
>> serial_struct structure was really targeted for a LINFlex port. It
>> needs to be defined outside, to avoid "collisions" with other drivers.
>
> Yes, I know what it goes to, but does anyone in userspace actually use
> it?

No, we do not use it from userspace, but kept the pattern only for
conformance.

>> Other than that, I do not see anything wrong with the addition of a
>> define in serial_core.h for this purpose (which is also what most of the
>> serial drivers do, including amba-pl011.c, mentioned in
>> Documentation/driver-api/serial/driver.rst as providing the reference
>> implementation), so please be more specific.
>
> I am getting tired of dealing with merge issues with that list, and no
> one seems to be able to find where they are really needed for userspace,
> especially for new devices. What happens if you do not have use it?

I see. If I drop its usage completely and leave 'type' from the
uart_port as 0, uart_port_startup() will fail when finding that
uport->type == PORT_UNKNOWN at [1] (there may be other effects as well,
e.g. due to the check in uart_configure_port[2]).

So I suppose that I need to define some nonzero 'PORT_KNOWN' macro in
the driver and use that one internally for 'type'. Is my understanding
correct? Will there be any problems if I define it to a positive integer
which is already assigned to another driver, according to serial_core.h?

Regards,
Stefan

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c?h=v5.3-rc1#n188
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c?h=v5.3-rc1#n2348

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-07 18:43    [W:0.113 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site