Messages in this thread | | | From | Parav Pandit <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] vfio/mdev: Removed unused and redundant API for mdev UUID | Date | Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:33:11 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 2:58 PM > To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; wankhede@nvidia.com; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; alex.williamson@redhat.com; cjia@nvidia.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] vfio/mdev: Removed unused and redundant API for > mdev UUID > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:18:26 -0500 > Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> wrote: > > > There is no single production driver who is interested in mdev device > > uuid. Currently UUID is mainly used to derive a device name. > > Additionally mdev device name is already available using core kernel > > API dev_name(). > > Well, the mdev code actually uses the uuid to check for duplicates before > registration with the driver core would fail... I'd just drop the two sentences Yes, it does the check. But its mainly used to derive a device name. And to ensure that there are no two devices with duplicate name, it compares with the uuid.
Even this 16 bytes storage is redundant. Subsequently, I will submit a patch to get rid of storing this 16 bytes of UUID too. Because for duplicate name check, device name itself is pretty good enough.
Since I ran out of time and rc-4 is going on, I differed the 3rd simplification patch.
Commit message actually came from the thoughts of 3rd patch, but I see that without it, its not so intuitive.
> talking about the device name, IMHO they don't really add useful information; > but I'll leave that decision to the maintainers. > > > > > Hence removed unused exported symbol. > > > > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> > > --- > > Changelog: > > v0->v1: > > - Updated commit log to address comments from Cornelia > > --- > > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 6 ------ > > include/linux/mdev.h | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Thanks for the review.
| |