[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)
On 8/6/19 10:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:18:49PM +0000, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
>> I think you need to keep everything inside the original if statement since
>> the caller is expecting a page pointer to be returned in this case and not
>> the page_address() which is returned when the DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
>> is not present.
> DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is defined to return an opaque cookie,
> which just happens to be a page pointer. So if we fix up the free side
> as pointed out by Lucas we should be fine.

As long as two different cookie types (page pointer for encrypted DMA
and virtual address returned from page_address() for unencrypted DMA)
is ok. I'm just not familiar with how the cookie is used in any other
functions, if at all.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-06 18:00    [W:0.073 / U:2.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site