lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 2/6] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 6:11 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com; Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>;
> kwankhede@nvidia.com; davem@davemloft.net; kvm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:19:00 -0500
> Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> > Mdev alias should be unique among all the mdevs, so that when such
> > alias is used by the mdev users to derive other objects, there is no
> > collision in a given system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v1->v2:
> > - Moved alias NULL check at beginning
> > v0->v1:
> > - Fixed inclusiong of alias for NULL check
> > - Added ratelimited debug print for sha1 hash collision error
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c index 3bdff0469607..c9bf2ac362b9
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > @@ -388,6 +388,13 @@ int mdev_device_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct
> device *dev,
> > ret = -EEXIST;
> > goto mdev_fail;
> > }
> > + if (alias && tmp->alias && strcmp(alias, tmp->alias) == 0) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&mdev_list_lock);
> > + ret = -EEXIST;
> > + dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, "Hash collision in alias
> creation for UUID %pUl\n",
> > + uuid);
> > + goto mdev_fail;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > mdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Any reason not to merge this into the first patch?
No. It surely can be merged. Its easy to start with smaller patches instead of splitting. :-)
Doing uniqueness comparison was easy to split as independent functionality, so did as 2nd patch.
But either way is ok.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-30 15:00    [W:0.102 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site