[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] x86/mm/tlb: Defer PTI flushes
On 8/23/19 3:52 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> INVPCID is considerably slower than INVLPG of a single PTE. Using it to
> flush the user page-tables when PTI is enabled therefore introduces
> significant overhead.

I'm not sure this is worth all the churn, especially in the entry code.
For large flushes (> tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling), we don't do
INVPCIDs in the first place.

I'd really want to understand what the heck is going on that makes
INVPCID so slow, first.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-27 20:29    [W:0.148 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site