lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] uacce: add uacce module
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 05:34:25PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> +/* lock to protect all queues management */
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(uacce_qs_lock);
> +#define uacce_qs_rlock() down_read(&uacce_qs_lock)
> +#define uacce_qs_runlock() up_read(&uacce_qs_lock)
> +#define uacce_qs_wlock() down_write(&uacce_qs_lock)
> +#define uacce_qs_wunlock() up_write(&uacce_qs_lock)

Do not define your own locking macros. That makes the code impossible
to review.

And are you _sure_ you need a rw lock? You have benchmarked where it
has a performance impact?

> +/**
> + * uacce_wake_up - Wake up the process who is waiting this queue
> + * @q the accelerator queue to wake up
> + */
> +void uacce_wake_up(struct uacce_queue *q)
> +{
> + dev_dbg(&q->uacce->dev, "wake up\n");

ftrace is your friend, no need for any such logging lines anywhere in
these files.

> + wake_up_interruptible(&q->wait);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uacce_wake_up);

...

> +static struct attribute *uacce_dev_attrs[] = {
> + &dev_attr_id.attr,
> + &dev_attr_api.attr,
> + &dev_attr_node_id.attr,
> + &dev_attr_numa_distance.attr,
> + &dev_attr_flags.attr,
> + &dev_attr_available_instances.attr,
> + &dev_attr_algorithms.attr,
> + &dev_attr_qfrs_offset.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group uacce_dev_attr_group = {
> + .name = UACCE_DEV_ATTRS,
> + .attrs = uacce_dev_attrs,
> +};

Why is your attribute group in a subdirectory? Why not in the "normal"
class directory?

You are adding sysfs files to the kernel without any Documentation/ABI/
entries, which is a requirement. Please fix that up for the next time
you send these.

> +static const struct attribute_group *uacce_dev_attr_groups[] = {
> + &uacce_dev_attr_group,
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static int uacce_create_chrdev(struct uacce *uacce)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = idr_alloc(&uacce_idr, uacce, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +

Shouldn't this function create the memory needed for this structure?
You are relying ont he caller to do it for you, why?


> + cdev_init(&uacce->cdev, &uacce_fops);
> + uacce->dev_id = ret;
> + uacce->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + device_initialize(&uacce->dev);
> + uacce->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(uacce_devt), uacce->dev_id);
> + uacce->dev.class = uacce_class;
> + uacce->dev.groups = uacce_dev_attr_groups;
> + uacce->dev.parent = uacce->pdev;
> + dev_set_name(&uacce->dev, "%s-%d", uacce->drv_name, uacce->dev_id);
> + ret = cdev_device_add(&uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_with_idr;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&uacce->dev, "create uacce minior=%d\n", uacce->dev_id);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_with_idr:
> + idr_remove(&uacce_idr, uacce->dev_id);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void uacce_destroy_chrdev(struct uacce *uacce)
> +{
> + cdev_device_del(&uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
> + idr_remove(&uacce_idr, uacce->dev_id);
> +}
> +
> +static int uacce_default_get_available_instances(struct uacce *uacce)
> +{
> + return -1;

Do not make up error values, use the proper -EXXXX value instead.

> +}
> +
> +static int uacce_default_start_queue(struct uacce_queue *q)
> +{
> + dev_dbg(&q->uacce->dev, "fake start queue");
> + return 0;

Why even have this function if you do not do anything in it?

> +}
> +
> +static int uacce_dev_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + if (dev->parent == data)
> + return -EBUSY;

There should be in-kernel functions for this now, no need for you to
roll your own.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-15 16:26    [W:0.154 / U:15.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site