lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next, 5/6] net/mlx5: Add HV VHCA control agent
Date


On 8/14/2019 11:41 PM, Mark Bloch wrote:
>
>
> On 8/14/19 12:09 PM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Control agent is responsible over of the control block (ID 0). It should
>> update the PF via this block about every capability change. In addition,
>> upon block 0 invalidate, it should activate all other supported agents
>> with data requests from the PF.
>>
>> Upon agent create/destroy, the invalidate callback of the control agent
>> is being called in order to update the PF driver about this change.
>>
>> The control agent is an integral part of HV VHCA and will be created
>> and destroy as part of the HV VHCA init/cleanup flow.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.c
>> index b2eebdf..3c7fffa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.c
>> @@ -110,22 +110,131 @@ void mlx5_hv_vhca_invalidate(void *context, u64 block_mask)
>> queue_work(hv_vhca->work_queue, &work->invalidate_work);
>> }
>>
>> +#define AGENT_MASK(type) (type ? BIT(type - 1) : 0 /* control */)
>> +
>> +static void mlx5_hv_vhca_agents_control(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca,
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_control_block *block)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_MAX; i++) {
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent = hv_vhca->agents[i];
>> +
>> + if (!agent || !agent->control)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (!(AGENT_MASK(agent->type) & block->control))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + agent->control(agent, block);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mlx5_hv_vhca_capabilities(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca,
>> + u32 *capabilities)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_MAX; i++) {
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent = hv_vhca->agents[i];
>> +
>> + if (agent)
>> + *capabilities |= AGENT_MASK(agent->type);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void
>> +mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_invalidate(struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent,
>> + u64 block_mask)
>> +{
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca = agent->hv_vhca;
>> + struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = hv_vhca->dev;
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_control_block *block;
>> + u32 capabilities = 0;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + block = kzalloc(sizeof(*block), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!block)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + err = mlx5_hv_read_config(dev, block, sizeof(*block), 0);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto free_block;
>> +
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_capabilities(hv_vhca, &capabilities);
>> +
>> + /* In case no capabilities, send empty block in return */
>> + if (!capabilities) {
>> + memset(block, 0, sizeof(*block));
>> + goto write;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (block->capabilities != capabilities)
>> + block->capabilities = capabilities;
>> +
>> + if (block->control & ~capabilities)
>> + goto free_block;
>> +
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_agents_control(hv_vhca, block);
>> + block->command_ack = block->command;
>> +
>> +write:
>> + mlx5_hv_write_config(dev, block, sizeof(*block), 0);
>> +
>> +free_block:
>> + kfree(block);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *
>> +mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_create(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca)
>> +{
>> + return mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_create(hv_vhca, MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_CONTROL,
>> + NULL,
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_invalidate,
>> + NULL, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_destroy(struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent)
>> +{
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_destroy(agent);
>> +}
>> +
>> int mlx5_hv_vhca_init(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca)
>> {
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hv_vhca))
>> return IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hv_vhca);
>>
>> - return mlx5_hv_register_invalidate(hv_vhca->dev, hv_vhca,
>> - mlx5_hv_vhca_invalidate);
>> + err = mlx5_hv_register_invalidate(hv_vhca->dev, hv_vhca,
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_invalidate);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + agent = mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_create(hv_vhca);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(agent)) {
>> + mlx5_hv_unregister_invalidate(hv_vhca->dev);
>> + return IS_ERR_OR_NULL(agent);
>> + }
>> +
>> + hv_vhca->agents[MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_CONTROL] = agent;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> void mlx5_hv_vhca_cleanup(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca)
>> {
>> + struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent;
>> int i;
>>
>> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(hv_vhca))
>> return;
>>
>> + agent = hv_vhca->agents[MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_CONTROL];
>> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(agent))
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_control_agent_destroy(agent);
>
> Can the agent be err ptr here?

Only NULL, will fix.

>
>> +
>> mutex_lock(&hv_vhca->agents_lock);
>> for (i = 0; i < MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_MAX; i++)
>> WARN_ON(hv_vhca->agents[i]);
>
> With the comment above in mind, here you check only for not null

Comment above was right... after fixing it, all is aligned here.

>
>> @@ -135,6 +244,11 @@ void mlx5_hv_vhca_cleanup(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca)
>> mlx5_hv_unregister_invalidate(hv_vhca->dev);
>> }
>>
>> +static void mlx5_hv_vhca_agents_update(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca)
>> +{
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_invalidate(hv_vhca, BIT(MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_CONTROL));
>> +}
>> +
>> struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *
>> mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_create(struct mlx5_hv_vhca *hv_vhca,
>> enum mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_type type,
>> @@ -168,6 +282,8 @@ struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *
>> hv_vhca->agents[type] = agent;
>> mutex_unlock(&hv_vhca->agents_lock);
>>
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_agents_update(hv_vhca);
>> +
>> return agent;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -189,6 +305,8 @@ void mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_destroy(struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent)
>> agent->cleanup(agent);
>>
>> kfree(agent);
>> +
>> + mlx5_hv_vhca_agents_update(hv_vhca);
>> }
>>
>> static int mlx5_hv_vhca_data_block_prepare(struct mlx5_hv_vhca_agent *agent,
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.h
>> index fa7ee85..6f4bfb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/hv_vhca.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> struct mlx5_hv_vhca_control_block;
>>
>> enum mlx5_hv_vhca_agent_type {
>> + MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_CONTROL = 0,
>
> No need to start value

I find it more easy to read when having the value explicitly.
If you or Saeed has a strong opinion against it, this can be easily fixed.

>
>> MLX5_HV_VHCA_AGENT_MAX = 32,
>> };
>>
>>
>
> Mark
>
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-15 13:37    [W:0.063 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site