Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add device links to clocks | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Date | Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:41:05 -0700 |
| |
Quoting Miquel Raynal (2019-07-27 01:53:30) > > I know this series might have side effects despite the consequent > amount of time spent to write and test it, but I also think the > clk subsystem would really benefit from such change and handling > suspend to RAM support would be greatly enhanced. You seemed > interested at first and now not anymore, could I know why? I got > inspired by the regulators subsystem. It is not an idea of mine > that device links should be bring to clocks. Regulators are almost > as used as clocks so I really understand your fears but why not > applying this to -next very early during the -rc cycles and see > what happens? You'll have plenty of time to ask me to fix things > or even drop it off. >
Ok, I'm back on this topic. Let me look at the latest code and see how it works on a qcom platform I have in hand. If the device links look OK then it should be good. I also want to make sure we're not holding a nested pile of locks when we're adding the device links so that we don't get some weird lockdep problems.
| |