lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 04/18] kunit: test: add assertion printing library
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:56 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> > > Add `struct kunit_assert` and friends which provide a structured way to
> > > capture data from an expectation or an assertion (introduced later in
> > > the series) so that it may be printed out in the event of a failure.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> >
> > Just some minor nits below
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000000..55f1b88b0cb4d
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
> > [...]
> > > + struct string_stream *stream);
> > > +
> > > +struct kunit_fail_assert {
> > > + struct kunit_assert assert;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
> > > + struct string_stream *stream);
> > > +
> > > +#define KUNIT_INIT_FAIL_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, type) { \
> > > + .assert = KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, \
> > > + type, \
> > > + kunit_fail_assert_format) \
> >
> > This one got indented one too many times?
>
> Not unless I have been using the wrong formatting for multiline
> macros. You can see this commit applied here:
> https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/870964da2990920030990dd1ffb647ef408e52df/include/kunit/assert.h#59
>
> I have test, type, and kunit_fail_assert_format all column aligned (it
> just doesn't render nicely in the patch format).

Disregard that last comment. I just looked at the line immediately
above your comment and thought it looked correct. Sorry about that
(you were pointing out that the .assert line looked wrong, correct?).

> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +struct kunit_unary_assert {
> > > + struct kunit_assert assert;
> > > + const char *condition;
> > > + bool expected_true;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
> > > + struct string_stream *stream);
> > > +
> > [...]
> > > +#define KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, \
> > > + type, \
> > > + op_str, \
> > > + left_str, \
> > > + left_val, \
> > > + right_str, \
> > > + right_val) { \
> > > + .assert = KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, \
> > > + type, \
> > > + kunit_binary_str_assert_format), \
> > > + .operation = op_str, \
> > > + .left_text = left_str, \
> > > + .left_value = left_val, \
> > > + .right_text = right_str, \
> > > + .right_value = right_val \
> > > +}
> >
> > It would be nice to have kernel doc on these macros so we know how to
> > use them.
>
> Sounds good. Will fix.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-13 06:28    [W:0.059 / U:21.680 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site