[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the arm64 tree
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:34:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> between commit:
> 98dc19902a0b ("arm64: topology: Use PPTT to determine if PE is a thread")
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 60c1b220d8bc ("cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.")
> from the risc-v tree.
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks, Stephen.

Paul, Palmer -- If it's not too late, then it would probably be best to
stick this commit (60c1b220d8bc) and any dependencies on their own stable
branch so that we can both pull it into our respective trees and I can
resolve this conflict in the arm64 tree, which I'll send early during the
merge window.

Looking at your tree, I guess I could just pull in
common/for-v5.4-rc1/cpu-topology if you promise never to rebase it. Failing
that, you could fork a new branch from 60c1b220d8bc and I could just pull
that part instead.

Please let me know.


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-13 10:24    [W:0.058 / U:16.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site