lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 06/19] ktf: A simple debugfs interface to test results
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 08:09:21AM +0200, Knut Omang wrote:
> From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
>
> While test results is available via netlink from user space, sometimes
> it may be useful to be able to access the results from the kernel as well,
> for instance due to a crash. Make that possible via debugfs.
>
> ktf_debugfs.h: Support for creating a debugfs representation of test
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.c | 356 ++++++++++++++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.h | 34 ++-
> 2 files changed, 390 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a20fbd2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ktf/kernel/ktf_debugfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,356 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2009, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Has to be the first line of the file, did you run this through
checkpatch?

> +static int ktf_run_test_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct ktf_test *t;
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> + return -EIO;

This is an anti-pattern, and one guaranteed to not work properly. NEVER
do this.

> +
> + t = (struct ktf_test *)inode->i_private;
> +
> + return single_open(file, ktf_debugfs_run, t);
> +}
> +
> +static int ktf_debugfs_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + module_put(THIS_MODULE);

Same here, not ok.


> + return single_release(inode, file);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations ktf_run_test_fops = {
> + .open = ktf_run_test_open,
> + .read = seq_read,
> + .llseek = seq_lseek,
> + .release = ktf_debugfs_release,
> +};
> +
> +static int ktf_results_test_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct ktf_test *t;
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> + return -EIO;

Nope!

And why -EIO? That is not an io issue.

> +void ktf_debugfs_create_test(struct ktf_test *t)
> +{
> + struct ktf_case *testset = ktf_case_find(t->tclass);
> +
> + if (!testset)
> + return;
> +
> + memset(&t->debugfs, 0, sizeof(t->debugfs));
> +
> + t->debugfs.debugfs_results_test =
> + debugfs_create_file(t->name, S_IFREG | 0444,
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_test,
> + t, &ktf_results_test_fops);
> +
> + if (t->debugfs.debugfs_results_test) {

How can that variable ever be NULL (hint, it can not.)

> + t->debugfs.debugfs_run_test =
> + debugfs_create_file(t->name, S_IFREG | 0444,
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_test,
> + t, &ktf_run_test_fops);
> + if (!t->debugfs.debugfs_run_test) {
> + _ktf_debugfs_destroy_test(t);
> + } else {
> + /* Take reference for test for debugfs */
> + ktf_test_get(t);
> + }
> + }

Never test the result of any debugfs call, you do not need to. Just
call it and move on, your code flow should NEVER be different with, or
without, a successful debugfs call.


> +static int ktf_run_testset_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct ktf_case *testset;
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> + return -EIO;

Again no. I hate to know what code you copied this all from, as that
code is very wrong. Do you have a pointer to that code anywhere so we
can fix that up?

> +
> + testset = (struct ktf_case *)inode->i_private;
> +
> + return single_open(file, ktf_debugfs_run_all, testset);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations ktf_run_testset_fops = {
> + .open = ktf_run_testset_open,
> + .read = seq_read,
> + .llseek = seq_lseek,
> + .release = ktf_debugfs_release,

If you really care about module references you should be setting the
owner of the module here.

> +};
> +
> +static void _ktf_debugfs_destroy_testset(struct ktf_case *testset)
> +{
> + debugfs_remove(testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_testset);
> + debugfs_remove(testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_test);
> + debugfs_remove(testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_testset);
> + debugfs_remove(testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_test);

Why not just recursivly remove the directory? That way you do not have
to keep track of any individual files.


> +}
> +
> +void ktf_debugfs_create_testset(struct ktf_case *testset)
> +{
> + char tests_subdir[KTF_DEBUGFS_NAMESZ];
> + const char *name = ktf_case_name(testset);
> +
> + memset(&testset->debugfs, 0, sizeof(testset->debugfs));
> +
> + /* First add /sys/kernel/debug/ktf/[results|run]/<testset> */
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_testset =
> + debugfs_create_file(name, S_IFREG | 0444,
> + ktf_debugfs_resultsdir,
> + testset, &ktf_results_testset_fops);
> + if (!testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_testset)
> + goto err;

Again, can never happen, and again, do not do different things depending
on the result of a debugfs call.

> +
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_testset =
> + debugfs_create_file(name, S_IFREG | 0444,
> + ktf_debugfs_rundir,
> + testset, &ktf_run_testset_fops);
> + if (!testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_testset)
> + goto err;

Again, nope.

> +
> + /* Now add parent directories for individual test result/run tests
> + * which live in
> + * /sys/kernel/debug/ktf/[results|run]/<testset>-tests/<testname>
> + */
> + (void)snprintf(tests_subdir, sizeof(tests_subdir), "%s%s",
> + name, KTF_DEBUGFS_TESTS_SUFFIX);

why (void)?


> +
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_test =
> + debugfs_create_dir(tests_subdir, ktf_debugfs_resultsdir);
> + if (!testset->debugfs.debugfs_results_test)
> + goto err;

nope :)

> +
> + testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_test =
> + debugfs_create_dir(tests_subdir, ktf_debugfs_rundir);
> + if (!testset->debugfs.debugfs_run_test)
> + goto err;

Nope :)

> +
> + /* Take reference count for testset. One will do as we will always
> + * free testset debugfs resources together.
> + */
> + ktf_case_get(testset);
> + return;
> +err:
> + _ktf_debugfs_destroy_testset(testset);
> +}
> +
> +void ktf_debugfs_destroy_testset(struct ktf_case *testset)
> +{
> + tlog(T_DEBUG, "Destroying debugfs testset %s", ktf_case_name(testset));
> + _ktf_debugfs_destroy_testset(testset);
> + /* Remove our debugfs reference cout to testset */
> + ktf_case_put(testset);
> +}
> +
> +/* /sys/kernel/debug/ktf/coverage shows coverage statistics. */
> +static int ktf_debugfs_cov(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> + ktf_cov_seq_print(seq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ktf_cov_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> + return -EIO;

{sigh} I'll stop reviewing now :)

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-13 10:22    [W:0.158 / U:49.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site