lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the pci tree
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:58:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:47:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > Documentation/index.rst
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > c42eaffa1656 ("Documentation: add Linux PCI to Sphinx TOC tree")
> >
> > from the pci tree and commit:
> >
> > ecefae6db042 ("docs: usb: rename files to .rst and add them to drivers-api")
> >
> > from the usb tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc Documentation/index.rst
> > index 239100accbf6,91055adde327..000000000000
> > --- a/Documentation/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
> > @@@ -101,7 -101,7 +101,8 @@@ needed)
> > filesystems/index
> > vm/index
> > bpf/index
> > + PCI/index
> > + usb/index
> > misc-devices/index
> >
> > Architecture-specific documentation
>
> I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
> Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

For a merge issue like this, I think he can handle it :)

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-09 08:36    [W:0.083 / U:34.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site