Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH v2] rtc: stm32: One condition check and function call less in stm32_rtc_set_alarm() | From | Markus Elfring <> | Date | Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:42:35 +0200 |
| |
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:47 +0200
A condition check was repeated in this function implementation despite of a corresponding check in the stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable() function. Thus delete redundant source code here.
Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190707211638.sehikkear25dffah@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> ---
v2: Russell King pointed the change possibility out to omit a condition check at this place.
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c index 8e6c9b3bcc29..773a1990b93f 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c @@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm) /* Write to Alarm register */ writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar);
- if (alrm->enabled) - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1); - else - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0); - + stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled); end: stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(rtc);
-- 2.22.0
| |