lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v4 18/24] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Optimize CPUFreq notifier
Date
When CPU's memory activity is low or memory activity is high such that
CPU's frequency contribution to the boosting is not taken into account,
then there is no need to schedule devfreq's update. This eliminates
unnecessary CPU activity during of idling caused by the scheduled work.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
---
drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
index 43c9c5fbfe91..8d6bf6e9f1ae 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
@@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ static inline unsigned long do_percent(unsigned long val, unsigned int pct)
return val * pct / 100;
}

-static unsigned long actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
+static unsigned long actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
+ unsigned int cpu_freq)
{
const struct tegra_actmon_emc_ratio *ratio = actmon_emc_ratios;
- unsigned int cpu_freq = cpufreq_get(0);
unsigned int i;

for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_emc_ratios); i++, ratio++) {
@@ -239,15 +239,15 @@ tegra_actmon_account_cpu_freq(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev,
unsigned long target_freq)
{
- unsigned long static_cpu_emc_freq;
+ unsigned long cpu_emc_freq = 0;

- if (dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold &&
- dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold < dev->avg_freq) {
- static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra);
- target_freq = max(target_freq, static_cpu_emc_freq);
- }
+ if (!dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+ return target_freq;

- return target_freq;
+ if (dev->avg_freq > dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+ cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpufreq_get(0));
+
+ return max(target_freq, cpu_emc_freq);
}

static unsigned long tegra_actmon_lower_freq(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
@@ -531,16 +531,71 @@ static void tegra_actmon_delayed_update(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
}

+static unsigned long
+tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
+ unsigned int cpu_freq)
+{
+ unsigned long freq, static_cpu_emc_freq;
+
+ /* check whether CPU's freq is taken into account at all */
+ if (tegra->devices[MCCPU].avg_freq <=
+ tegra->devices[MCCPU].config->avg_dependency_threshold)
+ return 0;
+
+ static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpu_freq);
+
+ /* compare static CPU-EMC freq with MCALL */
+ freq = tegra->devices[MCALL].avg_freq +
+ tegra->devices[MCALL].boost_freq;
+
+ freq = tegra_actmon_upper_freq(tegra, freq);
+
+ if (freq == tegra->max_freq || freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* compare static CPU-EMC freq with MCCPU */
+ freq = tegra->devices[MCCPU].avg_freq +
+ tegra->devices[MCCPU].boost_freq;
+
+ freq = tegra_actmon_upper_freq(tegra, freq);
+
+ if (freq == tegra->max_freq || freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
+ return 0;
+
+ return static_cpu_emc_freq;
+}
+
static int tegra_actmon_cpu_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *ptr)
{
+ struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs = ptr;
struct tegra_devfreq *tegra;
+ unsigned long old, new;

if (action != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
return NOTIFY_OK;

tegra = container_of(nb, struct tegra_devfreq, cpu_rate_change_nb);

+ /*
+ * Quickly check whether CPU frequency should be taken into account
+ * at all, without blocking CPUFreq's core.
+ */
+ if (mutex_trylock(&tegra->devfreq->lock)) {
+ old = tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(tegra, freqs->old);
+ new = tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(tegra, freqs->new);
+ mutex_unlock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
+
+ /*
+ * If CPU's frequency shouldn't be taken into account at
+ * the moment, then there is no need to update the devfreq's
+ * state because ISR will re-check CPU's frequency on the
+ * next interrupt.
+ */
+ if (old == new)
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+ }
+
/*
* CPUFreq driver should support CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION in order
* to allow asynchronous notifications. This means we can't block
--
2.22.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-08 00:35    [W:0.389 / U:6.280 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site