lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/8] thunderbolt: Use 32-bit writes when writing ring producer/consumer
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 02:09:44PM +0300, Yehezkel Bernat wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 12:58 PM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The register access should be using 32-bit reads/writes according to the
> > datasheet. With the previous generation hardware 16-bit writes have been
> > working but starting with ICL this is not the case anymore so fix
> > producer/consumer register update to use correct width register address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > index 27fbe62c7ddd..09242653da67 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
> > @@ -143,9 +143,24 @@ static void __iomem *ring_options_base(struct tb_ring *ring)
> > return io;
> > }
> >
> > -static void ring_iowrite16desc(struct tb_ring *ring, u32 value, u32 offset)
> > +static void ring_iowrite_prod(struct tb_ring *ring, u16 prod)
> > {
> > - iowrite16(value, ring_desc_base(ring) + offset);
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = ioread32(ring_desc_base(ring) + 8);
> > + val &= 0x0000ffff;
> > + val |= prod << 16;
> > + iowrite32(val, ring_desc_base(ring) + 8);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ring_iowrite_cons(struct tb_ring *ring, u16 cons)
> > +{
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = ioread32(ring_desc_base(ring) + 8);
> > + val &= 0xffff0000;
> > + val |= cons;
> > + iowrite32(val, ring_desc_base(ring) + 8);
> > }
> >
> > static void ring_iowrite32desc(struct tb_ring *ring, u32 value, u32 offset)
> > @@ -197,7 +212,10 @@ static void ring_write_descriptors(struct tb_ring *ring)
> > descriptor->sof = frame->sof;
> > }
> > ring->head = (ring->head + 1) % ring->size;
> > - ring_iowrite16desc(ring, ring->head, ring->is_tx ? 10 : 8);
> > + if (ring->is_tx)
> > + ring_iowrite_prod(ring, ring->head);
> > + else
> > + ring_iowrite_cons(ring, ring->head);
>
> Really a matter of taste, but maybe you want to consider having a single
> function, with a 3rd parameter, bool is_tx.
> The calls here will be unified to:
> ring_iowrite(ring, ring->head, ring->is_tx);
> (No condition is needed here).

I like the idea. We could even make it

ring_iowrite_prod_cons(ring);

and then use ring->head and ring->is_tx inside.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-05 13:25    [W:0.088 / U:17.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site