[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: syzbot bisection analysis
Hi Dmitry,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:08:16PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> The remaining 10 were all diverged due to other unrelated memory leaks
> and other non-leak bugs. It seems the main 2 reasons for this:
> 1. Lots of leaks are old (kernel is under-tested with KMEMLEAK).
> 2. Lots of unrelated bugs.
> It's unclear how much KMEMLEAK potential for false positives is in
> play. For example, lots of bisections are diverged by "memory leak in
> batadv_tvlv_handler_register", but this is a true bug reported at:
> However, some are diverged by e.g. "memory leak in __neigh_create" and
> "memory leak in copy_process" and these were not reported as separate
> leaks, so either false positives or true leaks fixed in previous
> releases.

Out of curiosity, when the tool tries to bisect a memory leak, does it
check for precisely that leak (e.g. by function name, object size) or
any other unrelated leak can confuse the bisection?


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-29 15:36    [W:0.072 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site