Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:48:51 +0200 | From | Andrew Lunn <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] net: macb: cover letter |
| |
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 01:27:58PM +0000, Parshuram Raju Thombare wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > >One thing which was never clear is how you are testing the features you are > >adding. Please could you describe your test setup and how each new feature > >is tested using that hardware. I'm particularly interested in what C45 device > >are you using? But i expect Russell would like to know more about SFP > >modules you are using. Do you have any which require 1000BaseX, > >2500BaseX, or provide copper 1G? > > Sorry for late reply. > Here is a little more information on our setup used for testing C45 patch with a view to > try clarify a few points. > Regarding the MDIO communication channel that our controller supports - We have tested > MDIO transfers through Clause 22, but none of our local PHY's support Clause 45 so our hardware > team have created an example Clause 45 slave device for us to add support to the driver.
O.K.
Given Russells reply, i suggest you submit the MDIO Clause 45 patch, and throw all the other patches away.
Andrew
| |