lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: remove macro from unit name
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:06 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Unit name is supposed to be a number, using a macro with hex value is

/s/name/address?

> not recommended, so add the value in unit name.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:966.16-969.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/adc@3100/adc-chan@0x4d: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:971.16-974.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/adc@3100/adc-chan@0x4e: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:976.16-979.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/adc@3100/adc-chan@0x4f: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:981.16-984.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/adc@3100/adc-chan@0x50: unit name should not have leading "0x"
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:986.16-989.4: Warning (unit_address_format): /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/adc@3100/adc-chan@0x51: unit name should not have leading "0x"
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> index 1ebbd568dfd7..9b27b8346ba1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> @@ -963,27 +963,27 @@ ap_ts_i2c: &i2c14 {
> };
>
> &pm8998_adc {
> - adc-chan@ADC5_AMUX_THM1_100K_PU {
> + adc-chan@4d {
> reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM1_100K_PU>;

I'm a little conflicted about this change. If we're replacing the
address with actual values, perhaps we should do that same for the reg
property to keep them in sync? Admittedly though, it is a bit easier
to read the macro name and figure out its meaning.

> label = "sdm_temp";
> };
>
> - adc-chan@ADC5_AMUX_THM2_100K_PU {
> + adc-chan@4e {
> reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM2_100K_PU>;
> label = "quiet_temp";
> };
>
> - adc-chan@ADC5_AMUX_THM3_100K_PU {
> + adc-chan@4f {
> reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM3_100K_PU>;
> label = "lte_temp_1";
> };
>
> - adc-chan@ADC5_AMUX_THM4_100K_PU {
> + adc-chan@50 {
> reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM4_100K_PU>;
> label = "lte_temp_2";
> };
>
> - adc-chan@ADC5_AMUX_THM5_100K_PU {
> + adc-chan@51 {
> reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM5_100K_PU>;
> label = "charger_temp";
> };
> --
> 2.20.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-23 07:09    [W:0.106 / U:29.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site