lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 12/24] erofs: introduce tagged pointer
From
Date
Hi Steven,

On 2019/7/22 ????10:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> and I'm not sure Al could accept __fdget conversion (I just wanted to give a example then...)
>>>
>>> Therefore, I tend to keep silence and just promote EROFS... some better ideas?...
>>>
>> Writing example conversion patches to demonstrate cleaner code
>> and perhaps reduce LOC seems the best way.
> Yes, I would be more interested in seeing patches that clean up the
> code than just talking about it.
>

I guess that is related to me, though I didn't plan to promote
a generic tagged pointer implementation in this series...

I try to describe what erofs met and my own implementation,
assume that we have 3 tagged pointers, a, b, c, and one
potential user only (no need to ACCESS_ONCE).

One way is

#define A_MASK 1
#define B_MASK 1
#define C_MASK 3

/* now we have 3 mask there, A, B, C is simple,
the real name could be long... */

void *a;
void *b;
void *c; /* and some pointers */

In order to decode the tag, we have to
((unsigned long)a & A_MASK)

to decode the ptr, we have to
((unsigned long)a & ~A_MASK)

In order to fold the tagged pointer...
(void *)((unsigned long)a | tag)

You can see the only meaning of these masks is the bitlength of tags,
but there are many masks (or we have to do open-coded a & 3,
if bitlength is changed, we have to fix them all)...

therefore my approach is

typedef tagptr1_t ta; /* tagptr type a with 1-bit tag */
typedef tagptr1_t tb; /* tagptr type b with 1-bit tag */
typedef tagptr2_t tc; /* tagptr type c with 2-bit tag */

and ta a; tb b; tc c;

the type will represent its bitlength of tags and we can use ta, tb, tc
to avoid masks or open-coded bitlength.

In order to decode the tag, we can
tagptr_unfold_tags(a)

In order to decode the ptr, we can
tagptr_unfold_ptr(a)

In order to fold the tagged pointer...
a = tagptr_fold(ta, ptr, tag)


ACCESS_ONCE stuff is another thing... If my approach seems cleaner,
we could move to include/linux later after EROFS stuffs is done...
Or I could use a better tagptr approach later if any...

Thanks,
Gao XIang



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-22 17:35    [W:0.126 / U:20.208 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site