Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:53:15 +0530 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] dmaengine: omap-dma: make omap_dma_filter_fn private |
| |
On 22-07-19, 16:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:36 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 22-07-19, 16:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:13 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 22-07-19, 10:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > With the audio driver no longer referring to this function, it > > > > > can be made private to the dmaengine driver itself, and the > > > > > header file removed. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190307151646.1016966-1-arnd@arndb.de/ > > > > > > > > This seems to point to older rev, my script updated it to latest one. > > > > > > That was intentional, to see the replies to the last time it got > > > posted. I'm not sure if that's the best way to do it, would you > > > rather not have that included? > > > > That's a valid point, but should we add both the links or just relevant > > one, common sense says former, scripting tends to add so keep both...? > > > > I am thinking of not changing the one submitted and let my > > script append. Is that fine? > > I think adding both is best then.
Ok, updated!
-- ~Vinod
| |