lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate domain_init() to avoid duplication
From
Date
Hi Alex,

On 7/19/19 11:19 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:27:04 +0800
> Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On 7/19/19 7:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:28:51 +0800
>>> Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The domain_init() and md_domain_init() do almost the same job.
>>>> Consolidate them to avoid duplication.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 123 +++++++++++-------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>> index 5215dcd535a1..b8c6cf1d5f90 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>> @@ -1825,63 +1825,6 @@ static inline int guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(int gaw)
>>>> return agaw;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>>>> - int guest_width)
>>>> -{
>>>> - int adjust_width, agaw;
>>>> - unsigned long sagaw;
>>>> - int err;
>>>> -
>>>> - init_iova_domain(&domain->iovad, VTD_PAGE_SIZE, IOVA_START_PFN);
>>>> -
>>>> - err = init_iova_flush_queue(&domain->iovad,
>>>> - iommu_flush_iova, iova_entry_free);
>>>> - if (err)
>>>> - return err;
>>>> -
>>>> - domain_reserve_special_ranges(domain);
>>>> -
>>>> - /* calculate AGAW */
>>>> - if (guest_width > cap_mgaw(iommu->cap))
>>>> - guest_width = cap_mgaw(iommu->cap);
>>>> - domain->gaw = guest_width;
>>>> - adjust_width = guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(guest_width);
>>>> - agaw = width_to_agaw(adjust_width);
>>>> - sagaw = cap_sagaw(iommu->cap);
>>>> - if (!test_bit(agaw, &sagaw)) {
>>>> - /* hardware doesn't support it, choose a bigger one */
>>>> - pr_debug("Hardware doesn't support agaw %d\n", agaw);
>>>> - agaw = find_next_bit(&sagaw, 5, agaw);
>>>> - if (agaw >= 5)
>>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>>> - }
>>>> - domain->agaw = agaw;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap))
>>>> - domain->iommu_coherency = 1;
>>>> - else
>>>> - domain->iommu_coherency = 0;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap))
>>>> - domain->iommu_snooping = 1;
>>>> - else
>>>> - domain->iommu_snooping = 0;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (intel_iommu_superpage)
>>>> - domain->iommu_superpage = fls(cap_super_page_val(iommu->cap));
>>>> - else
>>>> - domain->iommu_superpage = 0;
>>>> -
>>>> - domain->nid = iommu->node;
>>>> -
>>>> - /* always allocate the top pgd */
>>>> - domain->pgd = (struct dma_pte *)alloc_pgtable_page(domain->nid);
>>>> - if (!domain->pgd)
>>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>>> - __iommu_flush_cache(iommu, domain->pgd, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> static void domain_exit(struct dmar_domain *domain)
>>>> {
>>>> struct page *freelist;
>>>> @@ -2563,6 +2506,31 @@ static int get_last_alias(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *opaque)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static int domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int adjust_width;
>>>> +
>>>> + init_iova_domain(&domain->iovad, VTD_PAGE_SIZE, IOVA_START_PFN);
>>>> + domain_reserve_special_ranges(domain);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* calculate AGAW */
>>>> + domain->gaw = guest_width;
>>>> + adjust_width = guestwidth_to_adjustwidth(guest_width);
>>>> + domain->agaw = width_to_agaw(adjust_width);
>>>
>>>
>>> How do we justify that domain->agaw is nothing like it was previously
>>> here? I spent some more time working on the failure to boot that I
>>> thought was caused by 4ec066c7b147, but there are so many breakages and
>>> fixes in Joerg's x86/vt-d branch that I think my bisect zero'd in on
>>> the wrong one. Instead I cherry-picked every commit from Joerg's tree
>>> and matched Fixes patches to their original commit, which led me to
>>> this patch, mainline commit 123b2ffc376e. The issue I'm seeing is that
>>> we call domain_context_mapping_one() and we are in this section:
>>>
>>> struct dma_pte *pgd = domain->pgd;
>>> int agaw;
>>>
>>> context_set_domain_id(context, did);
>>>
>>> if (translation != CONTEXT_TT_PASS_THROUGH) {
>>> /*
>>> * Skip top levels of page tables for iommu which has
>>> * less agaw than default. Unnecessary for PT mode.
>>> */
>>> for (agaw = domain->agaw; agaw > iommu->agaw; agaw--) {
>>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> pgd = phys_to_virt(dma_pte_addr(pgd));
>>> if (!dma_pte_present(pgd))
>>> goto out_unlock;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Prior to this commit, we had domain->agaw=1 and iommu->agaw=1, so we
>>> don't enter the loop. With this commit, we have domain->agaw=3,
>>> iommu->agaw=1 with pgd->val=0!
>>>
>>
>> iommu->agaw presents the level of page table which is by default
>> supported by the @iommu. domain->agaw presents the level of page
>> table which is used by the @domain.
>>
>> agaw = 1: 3-level page table
>> agaw = 2: 4-level page table
>> agaw = 3: 5-level page table
>>
>> The case here is that @iommu only supports 3-level page table, but the
>> @domain was set to use 5-level page table. So we must skip level 4 and 5
>> page tables of the @domain.
>>
>> This code in the loop looks odd to me. It will always goto to unlock and
>> leave pgd->val==0. How about below change? (not tested yet!)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index 412f18aba501..98d6878cd29d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -2020,11 +2020,15 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct
>> dmar_domain *domain,
>> * Skip top levels of page tables for iommu
>> which has
>> * less agaw than default. Unnecessary for PT mode.
>> */
>> - for (agaw = domain->agaw; agaw > iommu->agaw;
>> agaw--) {
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - pgd = phys_to_virt(dma_pte_addr(pgd));
>> - if (!dma_pte_present(pgd))
>> - goto out_unlock;
>> + while (iommu->agaw < domain->agaw) {
>> + struct dma_pte *pte;
>> +
>> + pte = domain->pgd;
>> + if (dma_pte_present(pte)) {
>> + domain->pgd =
>> phys_to_virt(dma_pte_addr(pte));
>> + free_pgtable_page(pte);
>> + }
>> + domain->agaw--;
>> }
>>
>> info = iommu_support_dev_iotlb(domain, iommu,
>> bus, devfn);
>
>
> The system still fails to boot, now with DMAR faults indicating invalid
> context entry.

Ah! It demands more investigation. Thank you for testing this.

>
>>> I don't really follow how the setting of these fields above is
>>> equivalent to what they were previously or if they're supposed to be
>>> updated lazily, but the current behavior is non-functional. Commit
>>> 123b2ffc376e can be reverted with only a bit of offset, which brings
>>> Linus' tree back into working operation for me. Should we revert or is
>>> there an obvious fix here? Thanks,
>>
>> This commit is not the root cause of this issue as far as I can see, it
>> only triggers above loop to get entered.
>
> The system fails to boot with this commit, it does boot without this
> commit. Whether this commit exposed a latent issue or introduced a bug
> itself is academic. Thanks,

Okay. I agree wit you. Let's revert this commit first.

Best regards,
Baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-20 03:17    [W:1.062 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site