Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:01:23 +0200 | From | Halil Pasic <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function |
| |
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */ > > -bool sev_active(void) > > -{ > > - return is_prot_virt_guest(); > > -} > > - > > bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) > > { > > - return sev_active(); > > + return is_prot_virt_guest(); > > } > > Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?
Yes we do. With the comment transferred:
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Otherwise looks good: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
| |