lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/6] tpm: add driver for cr50 on SPI
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:05:52AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jason Gunthorpe (2019-07-17 09:56:28)
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:49:42AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Jason Gunthorpe (2019-07-17 05:25:58)
> > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 02:00:06PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> > > > > On 17.07.2019 00:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But overall, it might be better to just double link the little helper:
> > > >
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_CR50_SPI) += cr50.o cr50_spi.o
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_CR50_I2C) += cr50.o cr50_i2c.o
> > > >
> > > > As we don't actually ever expect to load both modules into the same
> > > > system
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sometimes we have both drivers built-in. To maintain the tiny space
> > > savings I'd prefer to just leave this as helpless and tristate.
> >
> > If it is builtin you only get one copy of cr50.o anyhow. The only
> > differences is for modules, then the two modules will both be a bit
> > bigger instead of a 3rd module being created
> >
>
> Yes. The space savings comes from having the extra module 'cr50.ko' that
> holds almost nothing at all when the two drivers are modules.

I'm not sure it is an actual savings, there is alot of minimum
overhead and alignment to have a module in the first place.

Jason


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-17 19:13    [W:0.806 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site