lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 07/24] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Use CPUFreq notifier
From
Date
On 19. 7. 8. 오전 7:32, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The CPU's client need to take into account that CPUFreq may change
> while memory activity not, staying high. Thus an appropriate frequency
> notifier should be used in addition to the clk-notifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> index 2bf65409ddd8..48a799fa5f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include "governor.h"
>
> @@ -154,7 +155,10 @@ struct tegra_devfreq {
>
> struct clk *emc_clock;
> unsigned long max_freq;
> - struct notifier_block rate_change_nb;
> + struct notifier_block clk_rate_change_nb;
> +
> + struct work_struct update_work;

nitpick.
I think 'update_work' is not clear to indicate the work
for changing the clock according to the cpu clock change.
You better to change the name for more clearly.

> + struct notifier_block cpu_rate_change_nb;
>
> struct tegra_devfreq_device devices[ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_device_configs)];
>
> @@ -456,8 +460,8 @@ static irqreturn_t actmon_thread_isr(int irq, void *data)
> return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
> }
>
> -static int tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned long action, void *ptr)
> +static int tegra_actmon_clk_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *ptr)
> {
> struct clk_notifier_data *data = ptr;
> struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev;
> @@ -467,7 +471,7 @@ static int tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> if (action != POST_RATE_CHANGE)
> return NOTIFY_OK;
>
> - tegra = container_of(nb, struct tegra_devfreq, rate_change_nb);
> + tegra = container_of(nb, struct tegra_devfreq, clk_rate_change_nb);
>
> /*
> * EMC rate could change due to three reasons:
> @@ -496,6 +500,37 @@ static int tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> +static void tegra_actmon_delayed_update(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct tegra_devfreq *tegra = container_of(work, struct tegra_devfreq,
> + update_work);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
> + update_devfreq(tegra->devfreq);
> + mutex_unlock(&tegra->devfreq->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_actmon_cpu_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct tegra_devfreq *tegra;
> +
> + if (action != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +
> + tegra = container_of(nb, struct tegra_devfreq, cpu_rate_change_nb);

nitpick. Better to check whether 'tegra' is NULL or not.

> +
> + /*
> + * CPUFreq driver should support CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION in order
> + * to allow asynchronous notifications. This means we can't block
> + * here for too long, otherwise CPUFreq's core will complain with a
> + * warning splat.
> + */
> + schedule_work(&tegra->update_work);
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> static void tegra_actmon_configure_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
> struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev)
> {
> @@ -527,9 +562,16 @@ static void tegra_actmon_configure_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
> device_writel(dev, val, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> }
>
> -static void tegra_actmon_start(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> +static void tegra_actmon_stop_device(struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev)
> +{
> + device_writel(dev, 0x00000000, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);

Better to define the constant definition of 0x00000000
in order to explain the correct meaning.

For example,
#define ACTMON_DEV_RESET 0x00000000

> + device_writel(dev, ACTMON_INTR_STATUS_CLEAR, ACTMON_DEV_INTR_STATUS);
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_actmon_start(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> + int err;
>
> actmon_writel(tegra, ACTMON_SAMPLING_PERIOD - 1,
> ACTMON_GLB_PERIOD_CTRL);
> @@ -537,7 +579,30 @@ static void tegra_actmon_start(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++)
> tegra_actmon_configure_device(tegra, &tegra->devices[i]);
>
> + /*
> + * We are estimating CPU's memory bandwidth requirement based on
> + * amount of memory accesses and system's load, judging by CPU's
> + * frequency. We also don't want to receive events about CPU's
> + * frequency transaction when governor is stopped, hence notifier
> + * is registered dynamically.
> + */
> + err = cpufreq_register_notifier(&tegra->cpu_rate_change_nb,
> + CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(tegra->devfreq->dev.parent,
> + "Failed to register rate change notifier: %d\n", err);
> + goto err_stop;
> + }> +
> enable_irq(tegra->irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_stop:
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++)
> + tegra_actmon_stop_device(&tegra->devices[i]);
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static void tegra_actmon_stop(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> @@ -546,11 +611,13 @@ static void tegra_actmon_stop(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
>
> disable_irq(tegra->irq);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++) {
> - device_writel(&tegra->devices[i], 0x00000000, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> - device_writel(&tegra->devices[i], ACTMON_INTR_STATUS_CLEAR,
> - ACTMON_DEV_INTR_STATUS);
> - }
> + cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&tegra->cpu_rate_change_nb,
> + CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> +
> + cancel_work_sync(&tegra->update_work);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++)
> + tegra_actmon_stop_device(&tegra->devices[i]);
> }
>
> static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> @@ -659,6 +726,7 @@ static int tegra_governor_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> unsigned int event, void *data)
> {
> struct tegra_devfreq *tegra = dev_get_drvdata(devfreq->dev.parent);
> + int ret = 0;
>
> /*
> * Couple device with the governor early as it is needed at
> @@ -669,7 +737,7 @@ static int tegra_governor_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> switch (event) {
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_START:
> devfreq_monitor_start(devfreq);
> - tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> + ret = tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> break;
>
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_STOP:
> @@ -684,11 +752,11 @@ static int tegra_governor_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
>
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_RESUME:
> devfreq_monitor_resume(devfreq);
> - tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> + ret = tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> break;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static struct devfreq_governor tegra_devfreq_governor = {
> @@ -794,9 +862,12 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tegra);
>
> - tegra-> .notifier_call = tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb;
> + tegra->cpu_rate_change_nb.notifier_call = tegra_actmon_cpu_notify_cb;
> + INIT_WORK(&tegra->update_work, tegra_actmon_delayed_update);
> +
> + tegra->clk_rate_change_nb.notifier_call = tegra_actmon_clk_notify_cb;
> err = clk_notifier_register(tegra->emc_clock,
> - &tegra->rate_change_nb);
> + &tegra->clk_rate_change_nb);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "Failed to register rate change notifier\n");
> @@ -823,7 +894,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> devfreq_remove_governor(&tegra_devfreq_governor);
>
> unreg_notifier:
> - clk_notifier_unregister(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->rate_change_nb);
> + clk_notifier_unregister(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->clk_rate_change_nb);
>
> remove_opps:
> dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -841,7 +912,7 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> devfreq_remove_device(tegra->devfreq);
> devfreq_remove_governor(&tegra_devfreq_governor);
>
> - clk_notifier_unregister(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->rate_change_nb);
> + clk_notifier_unregister(tegra->emc_clock, &tegra->clk_rate_change_nb);
> dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(&pdev->dev);
>
> reset_control_reset(tegra->reset);
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-16 14:06    [W:0.361 / U:4.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site