Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality, statistic | From | 王贇 <> | Date | Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:11:25 +0800 |
| |
On 2019/7/12 下午3:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote: [snip] >>> >>> Then our task t1 should be accounted to B (as you do), but also to A and >>> R. >> >> I get the point but not quite sure about this... >> >> Not like pages there are no hierarchical limitation on locality, also tasks > > You can use cpusets to affect that.
Could you please give more detail on this?
> >> running in a particular group have no influence to others, not to mention the >> extra overhead, does it really meaningful to account the stuff hierarchically? > > AFAIU it's a requirement of cgroups to be hierarchical. All our other > cgroup accounting is like that.
Ok, should respect the convention :-)
Regards, Michael Wang
>
| |