lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/6] cpuidle: Add unified driver for NVIDIA Tegra SoCs
From
Date
11.07.2019 6:13, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> The new driver is based on the old CPU Idle drivers that are removed now
> from arm/arch/mach-tegra/ directory. Those removed drivers were reworked
> and squashed into a single unified driver that covers multiple hardware
> generations, starting from Tegra20 and ending with Tegra124.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c | 4 +
> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 +
> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/tegra/cpuidle.h | 4 +
> 5 files changed, 321 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> index d9237769a37c..f1ce2857a251 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> #include <asm/mach/time.h>
> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> +#include <asm/psci.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
>
> #include "board.h"
> @@ -92,6 +93,9 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_late(void)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) &&
> of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra20"))
> platform_device_register_simple("tegra20-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA_CPUIDLE) && !psci_smp_available())
> + platform_device_register_simple("tegra-cpuidle", -1, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static const char * const tegra_dt_board_compat[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> index 48cb3d4bb7d1..d90861361f1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -76,3 +76,11 @@ config ARM_MVEBU_V7_CPUIDLE
> depends on ARCH_MVEBU && !ARM64
> help
> Select this to enable cpuidle on Armada 370, 38x and XP processors.
> +
> +config ARM_TEGRA_CPUIDLE
> + bool "CPU Idle Driver for NVIDIA Tegra SoCs"
> + depends on ARCH_TEGRA && !ARM64
> + select ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED if SMP
> + select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND
> + help
> + Select this to enable cpuidle for NVIDIA Tegra20/30/114/124 SoCs.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile b/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
> index 9d7176cee3d3..470d17fa8746 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/Makefile
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_U8500_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-ux500.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_AT91_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-at91.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-exynos.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-arm.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA_CPUIDLE) += cpuidle-tegra.o
>
> ###############################################################################
> # MIPS drivers
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..54974cd2255f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * CPU idle driver for Tegra CPUs
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2010-2013, NVIDIA Corporation.
> + * Copyright (c) 2011 Google, Inc.
> + * Author: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> + * Gary King <gking@nvidia.com>
> + *
> + * Rework for 3.3 by Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> + *
> + * Tegra20/124 driver unification by Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/trusted_foundations.h>
> +
> +#include <soc/tegra/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <soc/tegra/flowctrl.h>
> +#include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
> +#include <soc/tegra/pm.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <asm/firmware.h>
> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> +#include <asm/suspend.h>
> +
> +#define TEGRA_C1 0
> +#define TEGRA_C7 1
> +#define TEGRA_CC6 2
> +
> +static atomic_t tegra_idle_barrier;
> +
> +static inline bool tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware(void)
> +{
> + return firmware_ops->prepare_idle && firmware_ops->do_idle;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_shutdown_secondary_cpu(unsigned long cpu)
> +{
> + tegra_cpu_die(cpu);
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_await_secondary_cpus_shutdown(void)
> +{
> + ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * The boot CPU shall await for the secondaries shutdown in order
> + * to power-off CPU's cluster safely.
> + */
> + do {
> + if (tegra_cpu_rail_off_ready())
> + return 0;
> +
> + } while (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) < 0);
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static void tegra_wake_up_secondary_cpus(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu, lcpu;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(lcpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> + cpu = cpu_logical_map(lcpu);
> +
> + if (cpu > 0) {
> + tegra_enable_cpu_clock(cpu);
> + tegra_cpu_out_of_reset(cpu);
> + flowctrl_write_cpu_halt(cpu, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_cpuidle_cc6_enter(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = tegra_await_secondary_cpus_shutdown();
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = tegra_idle_lp2_last();
> +
> + tegra_wake_up_secondary_cpus();
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (tegra_cpuidle_using_firmware()) {
> + err = call_firmware_op(prepare_idle, TF_PM_MODE_LP2_NOFLUSH_L2);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return call_firmware_op(do_idle, 0);
> + }
> +
> + return cpu_suspend(0, tegra30_sleep_cpu_secondary_finish);
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> + int index, unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + local_fiq_disable();
> + tegra_set_cpu_in_lp2();
> + cpu_pm_enter();
> +
> + switch (index) {
> + case TEGRA_C7:
> + err = tegra_cpuidle_c7_enter();
> + break;
> + case TEGRA_CC6:
> + cpuidle_coupled_parallel_barrier(dev, &tegra_idle_barrier);

I realized that this is not very correct. We still need to do a proper
barrier with SGI checking in order to bail out if other CPU sent IPI
during of the awaiting for a coupled barrier to avoid the overhead of
unnecessary power-gating. Will correct that in the next revision.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-07-11 20:36    [W:0.144 / U:11.168 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site