lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.4 072/241] Revert "Dont jump to compute_result state from check_result state"
Date
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

commit a25d8c327bb41742dbd59f8c545f59f3b9c39983 upstream.

This reverts commit 4f4fd7c5798bbdd5a03a60f6269cf1177fbd11ef.

Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3897,15 +3897,26 @@ static void handle_parity_checks6(struct
case check_state_check_result:
sh->check_state = check_state_idle;

- if (s->failed > 1)
- break;
/* handle a successful check operation, if parity is correct
* we are done. Otherwise update the mismatch count and repair
* parity if !MD_RECOVERY_CHECK
*/
if (sh->ops.zero_sum_result == 0) {
- /* Any parity checked was correct */
- set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
+ /* both parities are correct */
+ if (!s->failed)
+ set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
+ else {
+ /* in contrast to the raid5 case we can validate
+ * parity, but still have a failure to write
+ * back
+ */
+ sh->check_state = check_state_compute_result;
+ /* Returning at this point means that we may go
+ * off and bring p and/or q uptodate again so
+ * we make sure to check zero_sum_result again
+ * to verify if p or q need writeback
+ */
+ }
} else {
atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-09 19:13    [W:0.601 / U:7.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site