lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] (Qualcomm) UFS device reset support
On Wed 05 Jun 23:32 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:

> >
> > On Wed 05 Jun 02:32 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue 04 Jun 22:50 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:22 AM Bjorn Andersson
> > > > > > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This series exposes the ufs_reset line as a gpio, adds support for ufshcd
> > to
> > > > > > > acquire and toggle this and then adds this to SDM845 MTP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bjorn Andersson (3):
> > > > > > > pinctrl: qcom: sdm845: Expose ufs_reset as gpio
> > > > > > > scsi: ufs: Allow resetting the UFS device
> > > > > > > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Specify UFS device-reset GPIO
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adding similar change as in sdm845-mtp to the not yet upstream
> > > > > > blueline dts, I validated this allows my micron UFS pixel3 to boot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > > > > Maybe ufs_hba_variant_ops would be the proper place to add this?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that these memories only need a reset when they are
> > > > paired with the Qualcomm host controller?
> > > ufs_hba_variant_ops is for vendors to implement their own vops,
> > > and as you can see, many of them do.
> > > Adding hw_reset to that template seems like the proper way
> > > to do what you are doing.
> > >
> >
> > Right, but the vops is operations related to the UFS controller, this
> > property relates to the memory connected.
> This is not entirely accurate. Those are vendor/board specific,
> As the original commit log indicates:
> " vendor/board specific and hence determined with
> the help of compatible property in device tree."
>
> I would rather have this new vop:
> void (*device_reset)(struct ufs_hba *), Or whatever,
> actively set in ufs_hba_variant_ops, rather than ufshcd_init_device_reset
> failing as part of the default init flow.
>

But such an vops would allow me to provide a Qualcomm-specific way of
toggling the GPIO that is connected to the UFS_RESET pin on the
Hynix/Micron memory.

But acquiring and toggling GPIOs is not a Qualcomm thing, it's a
completely generic thing, and as it's not a chip-internal line it is a
GPIO and not a reset - regardless of SoC vendor.
Further more, it's optional so boards that does not have this pin
connected will just omit the property in their hardware description
(DeviceTree).


So I think the halting part here is that we don't have a representation
of the memory device's resources, because this is really a matter of
toggling the reset pin on the memory device.

Regards,
Bjorn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-06 09:10    [W:0.053 / U:5.568 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site