Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Jun 2019 07:14:13 -0300 | From | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] media: do not use C++ style comments in uapi headers |
| |
Em Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:22:05 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> escreveu:
> On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 07:10 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:10:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:21 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > [] > > > This means we cannot reliably use uint{8,16,32,64}_t in UAPI headers. > > > > We should not be doing that as they are in the userspace "namespace" of > > variables, not in the kernel namespace. We've been over this many times > > in the past :( > > Just not very successfully... > > $ git grep -w -P 'u?_?int(?:8|16|32|64)_t' include/uapi | wc -l > 342
> $ git grep -w -P --name-only 'u?_?int(?:8|16|32|64)_t' include/uapi | wc -l > 13
Out of curiosity, I decided to check those occurrences...
About half of those 13 files are false-positives:
- bpf.h, pps.h and amdgpu_drm.h use those int types only inside comments; - drm.h and coda.h have their own typedefs for those int types; - vmwgfx_drm.h includes drm.h (which has the typedefs).
So, only 6 headers actually use posix types in a way that it seems that it would require including stdint.h:
- include/uapi/linux/fuse.h
This one explicitly includes stdint.h if !__KERNEL__
- include/uapi/linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h, include/uapi/linux/sctp.h, include/uapi/scsi/scsi_netlink.h and include/uapi/scsi/scsi_netlink_fc.h
They include linux/types.h unconditionally, relying on scripts/headers_install.sh to remove it;
- include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
It doesn't include anything. In other words, it assumes that the c file would include either linux/types.h or stdint.h.
---
Not saying that this is a good idea, but, as we have already a script that it is meant to sanitize uAPI header files when installing them (scripts/headers_install.sh), one could modify it (or convert to perl/python) in a way that it would be doing something like[1]:
sed -E ... -e 's,//(.*),/* \1 */,'
[1] the actual rule should be more complex than that, in order to avoid replacing // inside /**/ comments.
Thanks, Mauro
| |