Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:44:38 +0000 | From | Srikar Dronamraju <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in local node |
| |
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ > - > /* > * sched_numa_find_closest() - given the NUMA topology, find the cpu > * closest to @cpu from @cpumask. > * cpumask: cpumask to find a cpu from > * cpu: cpu to be close to > * > - * returns: cpu, or >= nr_cpu_ids when nothing found (or !NUMA). > + * returns: cpu, or nr_cpu_ids when nothing found. > */ > int sched_numa_find_closest(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu) > { > -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > int i, j = cpu_to_node(cpu); > > for (i = 0; i < sched_domains_numa_levels; i++) { > @@ -1754,10 +1751,11 @@ int sched_numa_find_closest(const struct > cpumask *cpus, int cpu) > if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) > return cpu; > } > -#endif > return nr_cpu_ids; > } > > +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ > + > static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map) > { > struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl; >
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju
| |