Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Jun 2019 07:18:19 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: convert to raw_spinlock_t |
| |
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:12:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We are working hard to get the remaining pieces in and to the best of my > knowledge there is no hard resistance against merging them.
I wonder whether it'd be useful to build some consensus around the approach. It'd be a lot easier for everyone involved than having the same conversation repeatedly. What do you think?
> What we are trying at the moment is to reduce the surface of the bulk of RT > changes and get the 'innocent' ones in. If you feel more comfortable, then > we can surely redo the series and pick 1,2,6 for now and keep 3-5 for the > final submission.
Yeah, that sounds good.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |