[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Clean up crypto documentation
    On 6/25/19 8:52 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
    > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:33:27 +0000
    > Gary R Hook <> wrote:
    >>> It's been "valid" since I wrote's just not upstream yet :) I
    >>> expect it to be in 5.3, though. So the best way to refer to a kernel
    >>> function, going forward, is just function() with no markup needed.
    >> So I'm unclear:
    >> 1) would you prefer I wait on your 5.3 change being fully committed,
    >> 2) add your change to my local tree and use it, then submit an update
    >> patchset that depends upon it, or
    >> 3) re-submit now (using the current method) with suggested changes?
    > I would just not mark up function() at all, and the right thing will
    > happen to it in the very near future.


    I applied your two patches (locally) to verify the result, and it looks
    good to me. In the interim, I think it's NBD.

    Thanks much.

     \ /
      Last update: 2019-06-25 17:30    [W:3.246 / U:2.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site