lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [LKP] [btrfs] c8eaeac7b7: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.7% regression
From
Date
On 6/26/19 11:17 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:39:36AM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
>> On 6/25/19 10:22 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:48:03AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>>> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, Josef,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greeting,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FYI, we noticed a -11.7% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commit: c8eaeac7b734347c3afba7008b7af62f37b9c140 ("btrfs: reserve
>>>>>>> delalloc metadata differently")
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in testcase: aim7
>>>>>>> on test machine: 40 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz with 384G memory
>>>>>>> with following parameters:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> disk: 4BRD_12G
>>>>>>> md: RAID0
>>>>>>> fs: btrfs
>>>>>>> test: disk_rr
>>>>>>> load: 1500
>>>>>>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark
>>>>>>> suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser
>>>>>>> system.
>>>>>>> test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/
>>>>>> Here's another regression, do you have time to take a look at this?
>>>>> Ping
>>>> Ping again ...
>>>>
>>> Finally got time to look at this but I can't get the reproducer to work
>>>
>>> root@destiny ~/lkp-tests# bin/lkp run ~/job-aim.yaml
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> 11: from /root/lkp-tests/bin/run-local:18:in `<main>'
>>> 10: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 9: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 8: from /root/lkp-tests/lib/yaml.rb:5:in `<top (required)>'
>>> 7: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 6: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 5: from /root/lkp-tests/lib/common.rb:9:in `<top (required)>'
>>> 4: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 3: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> 2: from /root/lkp-tests/lib/array_ext.rb:3:in `<top (required)>'
>>> 1: from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require'
>>> /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require': cannot load such file -- active_support/core_ext/enumerable (LoadError)
>> Hi Josef,
>>
>> I tried the latest lkp-tests, and didn't have the problem. Could you please
>> update the lkp-tests repo and run "lkp install" again?
>>
> I updated it this morning, and I just updated it now, my tree is on
>
> 2c5b1a95b08dbe81bba64419c482a877a3b424ac
>
> lkp install says everything is installed except
>
> No match for argument: libipc-run-perl

I've just fixed it. could you add "libipc-run-perl: perl-IPC-Run" to the
end of distro/adaptation/fedora?

Thanks,
Rong Chen


>
> and it still doesn't run properly. Thanks,
>
> Josef

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-26 05:32    [W:0.061 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site