[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
On 6/25/19 7:35 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> const struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
>>> + enum tlb_flush_reason reason;
>>> +
>> Should we just add the "reason" to flush_tlb_info? It's OK-ish to imply
>> it like this, but seems like it would be nicer and easier to track down
>> the origins of these things if we did this at the caller.
> I prefer not to. I want later to inline flush_tlb_info into the same
> cacheline that holds call_function_data. Increasing the size of
> flush_tlb_info for no good reason will not help…

Well, flush_tlb_info is at 6/8ths of a cacheline at the moment.
call_function_data is 3/8ths. To me, that means we have some slack in
the size.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-26 05:01    [W:0.054 / U:11.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site