lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] mtd: spi-nor: fix nor->addr_width when its value configured from SFDP does not match the actual width
From
Date


On 22/06/19 5:19 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi, Liu,
>
> On 03/31/2019 10:42 AM, Liu Xiang wrote:
>
>> Some is25lp256 get BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY from BFPT table for
>> address width. But in actual fact the flash can support 4-byte address.
>> So we should fix it.
>
> It's better to be imperative. Substitute "So we should fix it" with something
> like "Use a post bfpt fixup hook to overwrite the address width advertised by
> the BFPT".
>
>>
>
> We'll need a fixes tag here.> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
>> Suggested-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
>
> When? If they didn't explicitly suggested this approach, lets drop the S-b tags.
>

IIRC, this was actually Boris's patch. No need for my S-b tag me :)

Regards
Vignesh

>> Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> add a fixup for is25lp256 to solve the address width problem.
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 6e13bbd..d252a66 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -1682,6 +1682,28 @@ static int sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor)
>> .flags = SPI_NOR_NO_FR | SPI_S3AN,
>>
>> static int
>> +is25lp256_post_bfpt_fixups(struct spi_nor *nor,
>> + const struct sfdp_parameter_header *bfpt_header,
>> + const struct sfdp_bfpt *bfpt,
>> + struct spi_nor_flash_parameter *params)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * IS25LP256 supports 4B opcodes.
>> + * Unfortunately, some devices get BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY
> ^ which devices, did you get a list from issi?
>
>> + * from BFPT table for address width. We should fix it.
>
> How about "IS25LP256 supports 4B opcodes, but the BFPT advertises a
> BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY address width. Overwrite the address width
> advertised by the BFPT."
>
>> + */
>> + if ((bfpt->dwords[BFPT_DWORD(1)] & BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_MASK) ==
>> + BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY)
>> + nor->addr_width = 4;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct spi_nor_fixups is25lp256_fixups = {
>
> Naga will use "is25lp256_fixups" for the is25wp256 too, but it's not the case to
> change the name yet. All good here.
>
> I really want to have this in next, can I have an update in the next few days?
>
> Cheers,
> ta
>

--
Regards
Vignesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-24 13:09    [W:0.049 / U:2.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site