lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro
On 24-06-19, 10:53, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
> > is trying to avoid.
> >
> > Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> what about this one?

I didn't say something because Rafael already pointed out something
which he wanted. Actually he was the one who suggested it to Amit
initially.

http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJZ5v0huESFqOADqyym-ci-XcWpL4tbcd9a-jxe_KArXKpHFyw@mail.gmail.com

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-24 11:09    [W:0.108 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site