lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:29:29AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:53 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org> wrote:
>
> > 2) Do what Linus suggests above. We can use v1 of this series from last
> > September (see below for link) that adds this to the pwm subsystem.
> > The locking would need to be added so that it won't conflict with the
> > clk subsystem. This can be tied into the input subsystem with the
> > existing pwm-vibra driver.
>
> What I imagined was that the clk driver would double as a pwm driver.
> Just register both interfaces.
>
> There are already plenty of combines clk+reset drivers for example.
>
> Otherwise I'm all for this approach (but that's just me).

I agree that this makes sense. I especially like that it'll allow us
to use the existing pwm-vibra driver in the input subsystem with this
approach.

Brian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-25 02:55    [W:0.053 / U:38.616 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site