[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm-soc tree
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

3fe1ee40b2a2 ("ARM: use arch_extension directive instead of arch argument")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

24d2c73ff28b ("ARM: exynos: Only build MCPM support if used")

from the samsung-krzk tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
index 5ccf9d7e58d4,5abf3db23912..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
@@@ -14,5 -14,9 +14,5 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) += suspend.

obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += platsmp.o headsmp.o

- obj-$(CONFIG_MCPM) += mcpm-exynos.o
-plus_sec := $(call as-instr,.arch_extension sec,+sec)
-AFLAGS_exynos-smc.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
-AFLAGS_sleep.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_sec)
+ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_MCPM) += mcpm-exynos.o
CFLAGS_mcpm-exynos.o += -march=armv7-a
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-25 02:04    [W:0.023 / U:8.588 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site