[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Clean up crypto documentation
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 13:29:42 -0700
Joe Perches <> wrote:

> > Finally, would you prefer a v2 of the patch set? Happy to do
> > whatever is preferred, of course.
> Whatever Jonathan decides is fine with me.
> Mine was just a plea to avoid unnecessarily
> making the source text harder to read as
> that's what I mostly use.

Usually Herbert seems to take crypto docs, so it's not necessarily up to
me :)

I don't see much that's objectionable here. But...

> I don't know if this extension is valid yet, but
> I believe just using <function_name>() is more
> readable as text than ``<function_name>`` or
> :c:func:`<function_name>`

It's been "valid" since I wrote's just not upstream yet :) I
expect it to be in 5.3, though. So the best way to refer to a kernel
function, going forward, is just function() with no markup needed.



 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-24 22:39    [W:0.086 / U:36.968 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site